Premarital Sex
We would all agree that the moral code regarding
premarital
sex has changed from the turn of the century, and even from a
generation
ago. But has behavior changed? If so, how much has it
changed?
Why has it changed?
Historical Trends:
% OF FIRST BIRTHS OCCURRING WITHIN 9 MONTHS OF BEING
MARRIED
NINE NEW ENGLAND TOWNS
| Year |
%
|
| BEFORE 1701 |
11.1%
|
| 1701-1760 |
23.3% |
| 1761-1800 |
33.7% |
| 1801-1840 |
25.1% |
| 1841-1880 |
15.5% |

Look at this chart. This type of evidence is
the
best available to address the issue of changes in premarital sexual
behavior
over time. There were no surveys of sexual behavior prior to the
mid-20th century. Look at the measure of "premarital sex" being
used
here. Is it a good one? Certainly not the best. But
can
data like this tell us anything about trends in prevalence of
premarital
sex? Can anyone see "trends" in the data?
I think the major, perhaps only, conclusion we can
reach
from this data is that changes in prevalence rates have occurred over
time.
This conclusion is also confirmed by European research.
Apparently,
there have been times in the past during which premarital sex was quite
common, and times when it was much less frequent. This finding
should
give us some "pause" before we label the present time as being a
"revolutionary"
one during which for the first time in history premarital sex became a
common occurrence. This is simply not true.
Early 20th Century Trends:
Premarital Sex, American Females
Alfred Kinsey's Findings, 1937-1956
| BORN BEFORE 1900 |
73% NO PREMARITAL SEX |
| BORN 1900-1930 |
49% NO PREMARITAL SEX |
|
(BY AGE 20: 20% HAD EXPERIENCED INTERCOURSE)
|

Alfred Kinsey was a zoologist who became interested
in
human sexual behavior. He began interviewing individuals about
their
sexual behavior in 1937. By 1948 he and his colleagues, Pomeroy
and
Martin, had interviewed 12,000 people; by 1956, 18,000 people.
Let
me make a few points about Kinsey's work:
-
Kinsey did not interview a random sample of
individuals.
Kinsey generally went to groups and asked if its members would
participate
in his research.
-
75% of the females interviewed were college
graduates.
A sizable proportion of the males were convicted criminals, interviewed
in jails. In general, though, the sample most closely represented
white, urban, college educated Protestant Americans.
-
His interviews were quite good. His
interviewers received
extensive training. There were a large number of internal checks
in the interview schedule and interviewers were trained to confront the
subject when they thought lying was taking place. (Six people fainted
during
the interviews, three of them psychiatrists.)
-
The quality of the interview data was exceptionally
good.
Well, what did Kinsey discover about premarital sexual
behavior?
He uncovered a revolution in behavior that occurred among your
great-grandmothers.
1915 to 1920 was a period of significant change in premarital sexual
behavior.
In the interval after WW1 through the 1950s the incidence rates of
premarital
sex remained stable. Why this early sexual revolution?
The Sexual Revolution of the 1960s & 1970s:
PERCENTAGE OF NEVER-MARRIED WOMEN AGED
15-19
WHO EVER HAD INTERCOURSE, BY RACE, UNITED STATES, 1979, 1976, AND 1971
(ZELNICK AND KANTNER STUDIES)
|
AGE
|
|
1979
|
|
1976
|
|
1971
|
|
|
Total |
White |
Black |
|
Total |
White |
Black |
|
Total |
White |
Black |
| 15 |
|
22.5% |
18.3% |
41.4% |
|
18.6% |
13.8% |
38.9% |
|
14.4% |
11.3% |
31.2% |
| 16 |
|
37.8% |
35.4% |
50.4% |
|
28.9% |
23.7% |
55.1% |
|
20.9% |
17% |
44.4% |
| 17 |
|
48.5% |
44.1% |
73.3% |
|
42.9% |
36.1% |
71% |
|
26.1% |
20.2% |
58.9% |
| 18 |
|
56.9% |
52.6% |
76.3% |
|
51.4% |
46% |
76.2% |
|
39.7% |
35.6% |
60.2% |
| 19 |
|
69% |
64.9% |
88.5% |
|
59.5% |
53.6% |
83.9% |
|
46.4% |
40.7% |
78.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MALES |
|
| 17 |
|
55.7% |
51.5% |
60.3% |
|
| 18 |
|
66% |
63.6% |
70.8% |
|
| 19 |
|
77.5% |
77.1% |
79.9% |
|
What do Zelnick and Kantner's studies tell us? These
were
nation-wide random sample surveys. Obviously, real changes in
premarital
sexual behavior occurred during the 1970s. Zelnick and Kantner's
three surveys caught this sexual revolution right when it was
happening.
Our best estimate is that this recent period of rapid and significant
change
began about 1965.

Why do you think this recent change in premarital
sexual
behavior occurred during the mid-1960s - 1970s? What other trends
can you seen in the Zelnick/Kantner data? Any racial differences
and trends?


Did these racial differences "narrow" from 1971 to
1979?


There is evidence that this "liberalization" trend
ended
by the early to mid-1980s, and there even might have been some declines
in the prevalence of premarital sex since then.
1992 National Health and Social Life Survey:
Changes in the First Experience of Intercourse

Some of the survey's findings relating to premarital
sex:
- The study found that two thirds of young adults
reported
their first live-in partnership did not involve marriage. By contrast,
only 15 percent of males and 6 percent of females in their 50s said
they
cohabited.
- From another perspective, over half of women born
between
1933 and 1942 were married by the age of 20, as compared to one fifth
of
those born between 1963 and 1974. However, if cohabitation and
marriage
both are counted as women living with mates, the disparity between
older
and younger groups disappears. According to the study, 85 percent of
both
older and younger women formed live-in partnerships by the age of 25.
One
quarter of both groups had one partner before the age of 18.
Thus,
the ideal of being committed to one person has not changed over the
years,
but the way people go about it has.
- According to the study, an unpredictable pattern
of dating
and sexual experimentation followed by cohabitation and breakups has
emerged.
And, the cycle may be repeated several times, each with different
twists
and permutations.
- Delaying marriage obviously causes young adults
to engage
in premarital sex more often and with more partners. According to
Laumann, the study director, "They go through a much longer period
before
deciding about such issues as career and final residence."
Here are some of the survey's findings regarding males
and
female differences in their first experience of intercourse:





Recent Findings Regarding Premarital Sex:
Youth Risk Behavior Survey: Teen Sex 1991-2011
Beginning in 1990, as part of the Youth Risk Behavior
Surveillance
System, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
started
conducting national school-based Youth Risk Behavior Surveys
(1991, 1993, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011). These are large
surveys that
generally survey more than 16,000 students in over 150 high schools
throughout
the nation. These data on sexual activity are summarized from these Youth
Risk Behavior Surveys.

|
|
|
The news is that there
has been a bit of a decline in
the
percent of high school students who have ever been sexual active. There is also some very good
news --
which
might indicate that sex education might be working -- condom
use has increased dramatically. Among high school students who
are sexually active, condom
use
has increased from 46.7% to 61.5% over a 16 year period.
The recent slight decline in condom use, however, has raised some concern about the direction of this trend..
Go to the Center for Disease Control and find out more about the Youth Risk
Behavior Survey
National Survey of Family Growth
Data on Premarital Sex, 1988 to 2002
There is additional evidence of a decline in teenage sexual
activity from the National Survey of Family Growth 2002 (NSFG) and the
2002 National Survey of Adolescent Males . Interviews were
conducted with 7,643 females, 1,150 of whom were teenagers, and 4,928
males, 1,121 of whom were teenagers. These data can be compared with
data collected in the 1988 and 1995 NSFGs, and from the 1988 and 1995
National Survey of Adolescent Males. They present an interesting
time series. Look at the Male Chart. It shows a very
dramatic decline in the % of teenage males who have ever had
intercourse, especially from 1995 to 2002 -- a drop of 18.2 percentage
points for 19 year old males. The declines are less significant
for females. In fact, the Male/Female Comparison Chart shows that
by 2002 a higher percentage of 19 year old females had experience
intercourse than 19 year old males. Does this mark the end of the
double standard?
Males
|

|
|
Females
|

|
|
Male/Female
Comparison
|

|
Read the entire report: "Teenagers
in the United States: Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and
Childbearing, 2002"
Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, No. 24 (December 2004)
The data used in the above charts can be found in Table
3, Page 18.