Sociological Frameworks
Sociology is about understanding
patterns of behavior.
But how do you "begin" trying
the
understand any particular pattern of behavior?
Answer: You have to make
assumptions
about the nature of society or human beings. These assumptions
will
allow you to collect information, put it into a "framework," see
generalities.
Have all sociologists agreed
that
one set of assumptions is the best approach to understanding patterns
of
behavior?
Answer: No.
Groups of sociologists -- you
could
call them "schools" -- have found different sets of assumptions most
useful
for understanding patterns of behavior.
Below are four of the most
prevalent
"ways of doing sociology" current today.
Four Sociological
Frameworks
Two "macro"
frameworks -- used
to understand how whole societies
change over time.
|
| "Macro" Frameworks: |
Key Concepts: |
Structural-Functional
Framework |
Society is a "system"
"Institutions" are the parts of the social
system
Study institutions and how they relate to each
other.
|
Conflict
Framework |
Society is a collection of classes
Conflict and change are to be expected
Look for "contradictions"
|
Two "micro"
frameworks -- used
to understand how real groups
of individuals behave.
|
| "Micro" Frameworks: |
Key Concepts: |
Exchange
Framework |
individuals seek to minimize pain and
maximize pleasure
relationships can be understood by uncovering
what both
parties are giving and getting
|
Symbolic-Interaction
Framework |
individuals are "symbol" manipulators
understanding behavior entails uncovering its
symbolic
meaning for the actors
|
Structural Functional Framework

Basic assumptions:
-
A social system is a group of institutions
that together
fulfill the basic needs of a society.
-
An institution is a cluster of norms built
up around
a particular basic need.
-
For example, "the family" is a cluster of norms
that induce
individuals in a society to have children and take care of them.
-
All the institutions in a given social system are
related
to each other. If one institution changes, it will have
repercussions
on all other institutions in that system.
-
For example, if a society's economy changes from
being agricultural
to industrial then the family, polity, religion, etc... of that society
will also undergo changes.
An example of structural-functional analysis
Explain the change in the number of births average
American
women have experienced.
US Births per Woman: 1800-2000
|
Year
|
# of Births
|
|
1800
|
8
|
|
1900
|
4
|
2000
|
2
|
Conflict Framework

Basic assumptions/concepts:
-
Society is a cluster of classes.
-
The social structure is held together by the
actions of the
privileged class to preserve their position.
-
Each class will pursue its interest.
-
Pursuit of class interest is a basic cause of
social change.
-
The direction of social change can be uncovered by
identifying
the "contradictions" that lay behind the pursuit of class interest.
An example of conflict analysis
Explain why there were so many colonies in 1900 and
so
few colonies today. What brought about the end of colonialism?
What was in the interest of "mother
countries"?
Why did they want to have colonies?
ANSWER: As a source of raw material and
agricultural product, and as a guaranteed market for their manufactured
goods.
Mother countries tended to implement the following
policies
in pursuit of these goals:
-
"rationalize" agriculture by building irrigation
networks,
and practicing scientific agriculture. These changes increased
agricultural
output. They also provided more food for the population and
reduced
levels of malnutrition.
-
build transportation and communication systems in
their colonies:
canals, railroads, highways, telegraph system. These changes
lowered
the costs of transporting bulky raw materials and agricultural products
to market. They also helped eliminate the deadly effects of local
famines caused by drought or flooding.
-
implement public health measures: draining
swamps and
attempting to control malaria, yellow fever and other diseases;
building
latrines and separating drinking water from waste water.
These
changes provided them with a healthier and more productive
workforce.
They also dramatically lowered infant mortality rates.
-
built education systems to foster some degree of
literacy
within the colonial population. There was a need for a native
"middle
management" class to help administer colonial enterprises and
government
structures.
-
prohibited the development of industry in their
colonies.
They wished them to be only a source of raw materials and not
competitors
in the production of manufactured goods.
Can you identify any "contradictions" in these policies
that
might have worked to bring about the end of colonialism?